Alice in Wonderland II

[Елена]

А что уважаемое собрание скажет вот по этому поводу?

***
Nothing would be what it is,
Because everything would be what it isn't.
And contrary-wise
-what it is, it wouldn't be.
And what it wouldn't be,
it would.
You see?"
- Alice in Wonderland.


The herd goes to war - with itself

It is so easy for a small group of interbreeding family bloodlines to control the lives (in other words, the minds) of billions, once the key institutions of 'information' are in place, as they have been for thousands of years in their various forms. There are not enough of these manipulators and their stooges to control the population physically and so they have had to create a structure in which humans control themselves through mental, emotional and, increasingly, physical imposition.

Once you have the herd mentality policing itself, there is a third phase in this entrapment of consciousness. You create factions within the herd and set them to war with each other. This is done by creating 'different' belief systems (which are not different at all) and bringing them into conflict. These belief systems are known as religions, political parties, economic theories and 'isms' of endless variety. These beliefs are perceived as 'opposites' when, in fact, they are oppo-sames. The vision of reality and possibility within the pen is so limited that it contains no opposites and the elite bloodlines have to create the perception of them to manufacture the divisions that allow them to divide and rule. I mean, what is the difference between a Christian bishop, Jewish rabbi, Muslim or Hindu priest, or a follower of Buddha, imposing their beliefs on their children and others? There is none because while the belief they seek to indoctrinate may be slightly different, often very slightly, the overall theme is exactly the same - the imposition of one person’s belief on another. Look at the opposames in politics. The Far Left, as symbolised by Josef Stalin in Russia, introduced centralised control, military dictatorship and concentration camps. The 'opposite' of this was the Far Right, as symbolized by Adolf Hitler. What did he impose? Centralised control, military dictatorship and concentration camps. Yet these two opposames were set at war with each other amid propaganda that claimed they were opposites. The only difference between the Soviet Union and the so-called 'West' during the Cold War was that the Soviet Union was openly controlled by the few and the West was secretly controlled by the few. And when you get to the capstone of the pyramid you find they were the same few controlling both 'sides'. The same force operating Wall Street and the City of London funded all 'sides' in the two world wars and that’s provable.

So the methods of manipulation can be summarised thus:
• You need to first imprison the human mind with a rigid belief and a fundamentally limited sense of reality – the sheep pen. It does not much matter what these beliefs may be, so long as they are rigid and discourage free thought and open-minded questioning. Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism and all the rest each take their contribution to human servitude while apparently claiming different 'truths'.
• You encourage those who follow these rigid beliefs to impose them on others and make life very difficult and unpleasant for anyone who does not conform.
• You bring these beliefs into conflict, so ensuring the divide and rule you so desperately need for control by the few. While the masses are busy fighting each other, and seeking to impose their beliefs and views on each other, they don't see that the bloodlines have strings attached to all of them. Humans are like moths buzzing around a light, so mesmerised by their religious belief, the football scores, the latest row on a soap opera, or the price of friggin' beer, that they fail to notice the preparations being made to smash them on the arse with a swatter.

The same goes for nations.

Problem-Reaction-Solution

There are two techniques of mass manipulation that people need to understand if they are to begin to see through the game. One I have dubbed 'problem-reaction-solution' and the other I term the 'stepping-stones approach'. These have been used for thousands of years to advance the agenda and, together with fear, they remain the most effective weapons of the bloodlines. Since I first used the term problem-reaction-solution as an alternative to its previous name, the "Hegelian Dialectic", it has been constantly repeated among researchers and others communicating the techniques of control. This is fantastic because to understand this simple, but devastating, method of human manipulation is to become so much harder to fool. Problem-reaction-solution is the key to understanding what really happened on September 11th 2001 and why. It works like this: you know that if you openly propose to remove basic freedoms, start a war or centralise power, there will be a public reaction against it. So you don't openly and honestly propose such plans, you play the P-R-S scam. At stage one you create a problem. It could be a country attacking another, a government or economic collapse, or a "terrorist attack". Anything in fact that the public will think requires a 'solution'. At stage two, you report the 'problems' you have covertly created in the way you wish the people to perceive them. Crucially you find someone to blame for the problem, a "patsy" like Lee Harvey Oswald when President Kennedy was assassinated or Timothy McVeigh in Oklahoma. You spin the background to these events in a way that encourages the people to demand that "something must be done". These are the words you want to hear because they allow you to move on to stage three, the sting. At this point you openly offer the solutions to the problems you have yourself created. These solutions, of course, involve the centralisation of power, the sacking of officials or politicians that are getting in your way, and the removal of more basic freedoms as you advance further to your global fascist state. Just ponder on the freedoms that have been removed because of 9/11. A more subtle part of the technique is to propose far more extreme changes than you expect to get away with because this allows any opposition to think you have compromised and met them halfway. But you know that you have other "problems" in the pipeline to push the agenda on.

With this technique you can so manipulate the public mind that people will demand or at least allow you to introduce what, in normal circumstances, they would vehemently oppose. The Oklahoma bomb at the Alfred P Hurrah Building on April 19th 1995 was a problem-reaction-solution classic. What followed the death and destruction in Oklahoma were "anti-terrorism" laws that sailed through Congress without challenge and removed fundamental freedoms from American people. Since September 11th this agenda has been advanced in gigantic leaps. I don't share the attitudes of people like Timothy McVeigh, nor do I defend disturbed people like Osama bin Laden, but that's not the point. Establishing the truth of what happened is the point, no matter what the views and attitudes of those involved. I think it is called justice. The two most effective problem-reaction-solutions in the 20th century were the two global wars. They changed the face of the world, as wars always do, and led to a massive centralisation of power.

Media poodles ... woof, woof, lick, lick

The media play their part to perfection in these 'problem-reaction-solution' scenarios. At ownership level, people like Conrad Black at the Hollinger Group and Rupert Murdoch of News International know what is going on. The editors they appoint might know something about it, as may certain columnists, but most of the journalists will have no idea. The editor is always there to block anything they write that is against the interests of the bloodlines - as directed by the owner - and if they insist on pursuing an unwelcome story they find themselves looking for another job. Host of the "information" that journalists present comes from official (bloodlines) sources anyway. In the immediate aftermath of a major event such as September 11th where are the reporters getting their information? From official sources. Name me a single piece of relevant information broadcast by the mainstream media about what happened on 9/11, how it was done, who did it and what the retaliation should be, that did not come from official sources. Exactly. Nothing. We are told that White House sources say this, FBI sources say that, and CIA or Pentagon sources say the other. This is how the bloodlines transmit through the media the version of events they wish the public to believe. These reports are blazed across the front pages of newspapers and the top of radio and television news bulletins throughout the world, and what they say becomes the 'norm', the official "history". In the weeks and months that follow, researchers who are interested in the real truth begin to dig away. Over and over they establish and document the proof of how the official version was a lie from start to finish. But where are their reports published? In small-circulation newsletters, self-published books, and on radio stations that operate with a fraction of the money and potential audience of the bloodlines empires. Therefore, years after the official version has been demolished it still prevails in the public mind. Stop anyone in London, New York, Cape Town, Sydney, anywhere, and ask them what happened on September 11th, or in Oklahoma, the Second World War, or Kosovo. Almost every time they will give you the official story because that is the only one they have heard.

Stepping stones

The bedfellow of problem-reaction-solution is the stepping-stones approach. You know where you intend to lead people, but you realise that if you gave them the true picture or went there in one giant leap, you would, once again, face substantial opposition. So you travel to your destination in little steps and each one is presented in isolation and as unconnected to all the others. It is like a drip drip, drip, to global centralisation. This technique was used most obviously with the fascist superstate now known as the European Union. After the war if the politicians had suggested a centralised Europe with common laws and currency there would have been an outcry. People would have said they had been fighting Hitler to stop just such a European dictatorship and there was no way they were accepting another. To overcome this, the bloodlines offered a 'free trade area' and even used the problem of their manipulated world wars to encourage more cooperation between the countries of Europe. Once they had the free trade area, however, the foot in the door, they began to expand its powers until it became the fully fledged political and economic dictatorship that it is today. The same is happening with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), the 'free trade area' for Asia and Australia, and the same is planned for the African Union that replaced the Organisation of African Unity in 2001. I said in 1995 that the NAFTA 'free trade area' would be expanded to the whole of the Americas as the next stepping stone to a centrally controlled American Union. In 2001, George W. Bush, a bloodline, attended the Summit of the Americas in Quebec, Canada, at which this expansion of NAFTA throughout the Americas was agreed.

Look at today's newspapers and television news bulletins and you'll see the problem-reaction-solution and stepping-stones techniques played out day after day. One extremely effective way to see through this manipulation is to keep asking yourself a simple question when faced with these daily situations: 'Who benefits from me believing this version of events, or accepting the solutions and changes being offered as a result?' The answer will be almost every time: anyone who wishes to centralise power and suppress more of our freedoms.

(продолжение следует...)

[CBI]

Каковы практические способы уберечь свой мозг от заражения подобными вирусами массового поражения сознания?

Я знаю такие:

отказаться от кабельного и спутникового телевидения.

Смотреть программы и фильмы не те, которые предлагают по сетям, а те которые ты сознательно выбрал в библиотеке или виртуальном клубе типа Netflix используя свой опыт и опыт людей которым ты доверяешь.

Читать больше книг. Выбирать книги тщательно полагаясь на мнения источников которым доверяешь.

Всячески оберегать свой мозг от вирусов сознания, всегда требуя наличия проверяемых фактов.

[Митяй]

Почитайте "Структура магии" отцов НЛП. Там в разделе про метамодель все хорошо расписано - какие вопросы надо задавать другим, чтобы выявить и расшатать ограничивающие убеждения. И почаще задавайте эти вопросы себе - типа "откуда я это знаю ?" "что случится, если я это сделаю/не сделаю ?" и т.д.

[Pink Panther]

Почитайте "Структура магии" отцов НЛП. Там в разделе про метамодель все хорошо расписано - какие вопросы надо задавать другим, чтобы выявить и расшатать ограничивающие убеждения. И почаще задавайте эти вопросы себе - типа "откуда я это знаю ?" "что случится, если я это сделаю/не сделаю ?" и т.д.

А вы сам-то как, нлпёр будете?

[frankie]

Off topic, but couldn't help it:

Where the heck is this from?
"Nothing would be what it is,
Because everything would be what it isn't.
And contrary-wise
-what it is, it wouldn't be.
And what it wouldn't be,
it would.
You see?"
Did Alice say that in "Alice in Wonderland"?

May be, it is merely a double translation of the following classy sentence written by Mr. Dodgson, isn't it?
"Be what you would seem to be -- or, if you'd like it put more simply -- Never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise."

[Митяй]

Почитайте "Структура магии" отцов НЛП. Там в разделе про метамодель все хорошо расписано - какие вопросы надо задавать другим, чтобы выявить и расшатать ограничивающие убеждения. И почаще задавайте эти вопросы себе - типа "откуда я это знаю ?" "что случится, если я это сделаю/не сделаю ?" и т.д.

А вы сам-то как, нлпёр будете?

Данный вопрос мы с негодованием отметаем, как демагогический и неметамодельный. Правильным метамодельным вопросом будет "а вы самИ-то КТО, ...". Ну типа чиста падежов согласовать.

[Елена]

Blind faith

Over thousands of years, religion has brilliantly served this structure for human control. Religions have created rigid belief systems that should never be questioned. They have imposed those beliefs through tear, indoctrination, isolation, and the mass genocide of non-believers. They have fought each other for dominance of the human mind, thus producing an explosion of opportunity for the bloodlines to divide and rule for millennia. Another question: "is it more likely that a bloodline that has its origins in the ancient past, long before these religions were created, just happened to 'get lucky' when such a perfect vehicle for human control independently emerged? ... or is it rather more probable that these institutions of human enslavement were purposely created by these very same bloodlines to advance their agenda?" Look at where the major religions originated - in the very Middle/Near East where the bloodlines had its ancient headquarters (in Sumer). In the aftermath of 9/11 we have seen Islam used to manipulate the people, and all the religions are used in the same way when the situation suits. But religion is not the conspiracy, and nor are economics, politics and all the rest. They are part of a vast web of interconnected manipulation designed to persuade the masses to put themselves in prison and throw away the key. The bloodlines work through every belief system - religious, political, economic, racial and cultural - and through every side in the major 'debates'. The reason is simple. If you want to know the outcome of a game before the game has even started, you need to control all sides. The manager of a football team cannot dictate the result if he only controls one side. If, however, he is managing both sides, he can ensure the result he wants before a ball is kicked. So it is with the bloodlines, the hidden hand behind the events that affect our lives and our world every day. We should be aware when contemplating the events in New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania that the bloodlines operate through societies in the Near and Middle East every bit as much as they do in the United States and the so-called "West".


Fresh air Money

One of the most important aspects of the bloodlines control of humanity is the money system. The financial sting is very simple and spans the period from Sumer and Babylon to the present day. It is based on creating money that doesn't exist and lending it to people and businesses in return for interest. This creates an enormous debt for governments, business and the general population and you therefore control them. Vital to this has been permitting bankers to lend money they do not have. If you or me have a million pounds we can lend a million pounds. Very simple. But if a bank has a million pounds it can lend ten times the amount and more, and charge interest on it. If even a fraction of the people who theoretically have money deposited in a bank went today to remove it, the banks would slam the door in half an hour because they don't have it. Money in the bank is a myth, another confidence trick. When you go into a bank and ask for a loan, bank does not print a single new note, nor mint a single new coin. It merely type the amount of the loan into your account. From that moment you are paying interest to the bank on what is no more than figures typed on a screen. However, if you fail to pay back that non-existent loan, the bank can come along and quite legally take your wealth that does exist, your home, land, car and possessions, to the estimated value of whatever figure was typed on to that screen - plus interest. More than that, because money is not brought into circulation by governments, but by private banks making loans to customers, the banks control how much money is in circulation. The more loans they choose to make, the more money is in circulation. What is the difference between an economic boom (prosperity) and economic depression (poverty)? One thing only - the amount of money in circulation. Through this system, the private banks, controlled by the same bloodlines families, decide how much money will be in circulation. They can therefore create booms and busts at will. It is the same with the stock markets through which these families are moving trillions of dollars a day around the financial and banking system and deciding if they go up or down, soar or crash. Stock market crashes don't just happen - they are made to happen. Why would bloodlines do this when they have so much money invested in these markets? Well if you know the crash is coming because you are going to cause it, you know to sell at the highest point and buy back in once the crash has happened. In this way you can increase your holdings massively by acquiring companies at a fraction of the cost before your manipulated collapse.

Most of the "money" in circulation is not physical money: cash and coins. It represented by figures passing from one computer account to another electronically via money transfers, credit cards and cheque books. The more money, electronic or otherwise, that is in circulation, the more economic activity can take place and the more products are bought and sold, the more income people have, and the more jobs are available. But a constant theme of this financial coup has been to create a boom by making lots of loans and then pulling the plug, causing a depression or crash. Overpaid economists and economic correspondents, most of whom have no idea what is going on, will tell you that boom and bust is part of some natural "economic cycle". It is not. It is systematic manipulation by the bloodlines families to steal the real wealth of the world. During a boom many people get themselves into more debt. The vibrant economic activity means that businesses borrow more for new technology to increase production to meet demand. People borrow more to buy a bigger house and a more expensive car because they are so confident of their economic prospects. Then, at the most opportune moment, the major banks, coordinated by the bloodline network, raise interest rates to suppress the demand for loans and begin to call in loans already outstanding. They ensure they make far fewer loans than before. This has the effect of taking units of exchange (money in its various forms) out of circulation. This suppresses demand for products and leads to fewer jobs because there is not enough money in circulation to generate the necessary economic activity. People and businesses can no longer earn enough to repay their loans and they go bankrupt. The banks then take over their real wealth, their business, home, land, car and other possessions - in return for non-repayment of a loan that was never more than figures typed on a screen.

This has been going on in cycles over thousands of years, especially the last few centuries, and the real wealth of the world has been sucked out of the population and into the hands of those who control the banking system - the bloodline families. The same applies to countries. Instead of creating their own interest-free money, governments borrow it from the private banking cartel and pay the interest and the capital (sometimes) by taxation of the people. A fantastic amount of the money that you pay in taxes goes straight to the private banks to pay back loans of "money" that governments could create themselves interest free! Why won't they do it? Simple. The bloodlines control the governments as much as they control the banks. What we call "privatisation" is the selling of state assets in espouse to bank-created debt. The world's poorest countries are handing over control of their land and resources to the bloodline bankers because they can't pay back the vast loans made, on purpose, by the banks to ensnare them in this very situation. The world does not have to be in poverty and conflict. It is manipulated to be that way because it serves the agenda. "Third World" debt was manufactured to replace physical occupation of resource-rich or strategically situated countries under colonialism with today's financial occupation. Once a country is indebted to foreign banks, even though the money is non-existent credit, they are forced to hand over control of their affairs to the bankers, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, which then dictate economic and social policy at very level. In the end all roads not only lead to the same cabal, they also lead to the same word: control.

Criminal bankruptcy

When you begin to look behind the movie screen or, more appropriately, under the stone, you see a very different world to the one portrayed on CNN. Some researchers and lawyers suggest that many in the 1920s the Unites States, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal and many others officially declared bankruptcy, but somehow forgot to tell the people. This apparently happened during the five years of Geneva Conventions in Switzerland between 1928 and 1932, but it seems that they don't publish the volume containing details of the bankruptcy declarations. The bankers said that either the countries declared bankruptcy to the bloodlines banks or there would be no loans to get them out of the deep global depression at that time. So they accepted official bankruptcy to the global banking system and this meant, in effect, that the banks have owned those countries ever since. Actually, I say countries. In fact, the United States is not a country, but a corporation. No doubt we will find that the situation is the same in other countries too. This bankruptcy is actually in the United States Congressional Record of March 17th 1933 (Vol. 33, page H-1303). James Traficant Jr. of Ohio told the House:

"Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the US Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's report that will lead to our demise.”

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form o government for the United States. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: `The US Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States' ...

James Traficant was later jailed for alleged bribery and corruption. The US corporation was created behind the screen of a "Federal Government" when, after the manufactured "victory" in the American War of Independence", the British colonies exchanged overt dictatorship from London with the far more effective covert dictatorship that has been in place ever since. In effect, the Virginia Company, the corporation headed by the British Crown that controlled the former "colonies", simply changed its name to the United States and other related pseudonyms. These include, today, the United States, US, USA, United States of America, Washington DC, District of Columbia, Federal Government and "Feds". The United States Corporation is based in the District of Columbia (Queen Semiramis) and the current president of the corporation is a man called George W. Bush. He is not the president of the people or the country as they are led to believe, that's just the smokescreen. This means that Bush launched a "war on terrorism" on behalf of a private corporation to further the goals of that Corporation. It had nothing to do with "America" and "Americans" because these are very different legal entities. It is the United States Corporation that owns the US military and everything else that comes under the term "federal". This includes the Federal Reserve, the "central bank" of the United States, which is, in reality, a private bank owned by controlling stockholders (and controllers of the US Corporation) that are not even American. This is the bank from which the United States Corporation borrows "money" that is repaid with interest by the unknowing American taxpayers. The Federal Reserve was manipulated into being in 1913 and dictates the US interest rate that has a massive knock-on effect on the rest of the world. The Federal Reserve or "Fed" is currently headed by Alan Greenspan, a member of the bloodline front organisations like the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission. His predecessor was Paul W. Volker of ... the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission. The United States Corporation is owned by families and forces in Europe and the Jesuit-controlled Vatican is very much part of this covert ownership of not only the US, but major European "countries" also.

Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less? We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington DC have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this un-payable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it.

Aye, aye, captain, er, judge
The privately owned corporation known as the United States is the holding company, if you like, and the 50 states are its subsidiaries. Therefore these states also declared bankruptcy, or had it declared for them by the holding company, the "Federal Government", but the people never knew and still don't. You can get the detail about this elsewhere and I am only summarising the situation to give an idea of how deep this really goes. The sting has been set up so that when you register with the "Federal Government" in any way by accepting a Social Security number, driver's licence, or any of the other official federal documents, you are, unknowingly, agreeing to become an asset-employee of the United States Corporation. From that moment you become responsible for financing the corporation's state of bankruptcy. When you pay taxes or a court or parking fine and such like, you are servicing the bankruptcy by paying that money to "government agencies" that are nothing more than debt-collecting agencies for the "creditor" banks. The US court system operates under corporate law or the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to administer the bankruptcy and fleece the sheep to pay back the ongoing debt. This is also known as British Maritime (military) Law and this is why the American flag always has a gold fringe when displayed in the courts of the United States, and you find the same in government buildings and federally funded schools. The gold fringe is a legal symbol indicating that the court is sitting under British Maritime Law and the Uniform Commercial Code - military and merchant law not common or constitutional law. Under the Admiralty Law of Flags the flag displayed gives notice of the law under which the ship (in this case the court) is regulated. Anyone entering that ship (court) accepts by doing so that they are submitting to the law indicated by that flag. Judges refuse to replace the flag with one without a fringe when asked by defendants who know the score because that changes the law under which the court is sitting. If you appear in a court with a gold-fringed flag your constitutional rights are suspended and you are being tried under British Maritime (military/ merchant) Law. The Uniform Commercial Code was approved by the American Bar Association, which is a franchise, a subordinate branch, of the British legal system and its hierarchy. As I have been writing for many years, the power that controls America is based in Britain and Europe (very much including the Vatican) because that is where the power is located that owns the United States Corporation. By the way, if you think it is strange that a court on dry land could be administered under Maritime Law, look at US Code, Title 18 B 7. It says that Admiralty Jurisdiction is applicable in the following locations: (1) the high seas; (2) any American ship; (3) any lands reserved or acquired for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction thereof, or any place purchased or otherwise acquired by the United States by consent of the legislature of the state. In other words, mainland America. All this is founded on Roman law because the bloodline families have been playing this same game throughout the centuries wherever they have gone. The major politicians know that this is how things are and so do the government administrators, the judges and lawyers, and insider "journalists".

Those who realise what is happening and ask the court for the name of the true creditor or recipients of the fines imposed by the "legal system" are always refused this information by the judge. The reason is simple. The true creditors in such case., and the ultimate recipient of the fines are the bankers to which the corporation "country" is bankrupt. This is why more and more people in the US are refusing to register in any way with the Federal Government as news and documentation of this bizarre situation continues to circulate. If the authorities can keep this fantastic deceit from the mass of the people since the 1930s you can appreciate why they were confident they could ensure that what really happened on September 11th stays comfortably under wraps. I refer to what is thought to be the government of "America" as the United States or the US and, when I talk of the "US government" and similar terms, I am referring to the privately owned United States Corporation that is masquerading as the "government." It is not the government of a nation or country, it is a private corporation acting purely in the interests of the families that own and control it. The "American" president is simply the corporation's chief executive officer.

[basmachka]

Elena, prostite boga radi, a otkuda eti viderzhki? Soobschite esli mozhno, hotelos bi poznakomitsya s drugimi statyami avtora.

[Елена]

Низзяяяя. The conspiracy theory, понимаете ли. Но вывод делаем такой: "На свете счастья нет, а есть покой и воля", поэтому продолжаем дальше жить спокойно, заботясь о себе и своих детках, только иногда ухмыляясь на изощрения и ритуальные танцы власть предержащих любой "страны". А у кого есть способности - так и во власть можно. Если пустят.

[Vlad G]

А что уважаемое собрание скажет вот по этому поводу? ...
Look at the opposames in politics. The Far Left, as symbolised by Josef Stalin in Russia, introduced centralised control, military dictatorship and concentration camps. The 'opposite' of this was the Far Right, as symbolized by Adolf Hitler. ...

По ЭТОМУ поводу можно только сказать, что у автора проблемы с разделением право-лево в политике. Если автор не понимает политических процессов, то и про политику с ним не имеет смысла дискутировать.