АццкоМото wrote: ↑04 Apr 2018 15:47согнать мух с куска сыра!
я и не подумал об этом как о тесте Роршаха, но смешно
Т.к. мнения о графике разошлись, то вот выдержка из книги, чтобы, так сказать, приблизиться к оригинальной трактовке этого куска зеленого сыра в небе.
Sexy Job vs. ROI
Sectors are asset classes — the cool ones are overinvested, driving down returns on human capital (compensation for working there). If you want to work for Vogue, produce films, or open a restaurant, you had better get immense psychological reward from your gig, as the comp, and returns on your efforts, will likely suck. Competition will be fierce, and even if you manage to get in, you’ll be easily replaceable, as there are always younger, hipper candidates nipping at your heels. Very few high-school graduates dream of working for Exxon, but a big firm in a large sector would give you a career trajectory with regular promotions a sexy industry won’t.
...
In a sexy industry, rent due can drive you to desperation, and you’ll have neither a career, a stable future, nor recognized genius.
I don’t invest in smoothie bars, new fashion lines, or music labels. My greatest success has been a research firm. When I have someone smart in front of me excited about a SaaS platform that offers hospitals a better scheduling solution (so boring I want to put a gun in my mouth), I smell money.