+1
Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 37282
- Joined: 09 Jun 2010 15:58
- Location: LT-RU-NY
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 857
- Joined: 05 Aug 2004 21:24
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Очень скоро все белые будут поддерживать БЛМ:
Schools prepare to train children in Marxist BLM curriculum
https://www.wnd.com/2020/07/4835849/
Schools prepare to train children in Marxist BLM curriculum
https://www.wnd.com/2020/07/4835849/
Байдауны отс@сут!
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 37282
- Joined: 09 Jun 2010 15:58
- Location: LT-RU-NY
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Только не понятно при чем тут “марксизм», типа ругательное слово?Mini-DV wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 18:55 Очень скоро все белые будут поддерживать БЛМ:
Schools prepare to train children in Marxist BLM curriculum
https://www.wnd.com/2020/07/4835849/
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 857
- Joined: 05 Aug 2004 21:24
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Они сами себя так позиционируют:city_girl wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 19:10Только не понятно при чем тут “марксизм», типа ругательное слово?Mini-DV wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 18:55 Очень скоро все белые будут поддерживать БЛМ:
Schools prepare to train children in Marxist BLM curriculum
https://www.wnd.com/2020/07/4835849/
Black Lives Matter co-founder describes herself as ‘trained Marxist’
https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-fo ... d-marxist/
Байдауны отс@сут!
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 37282
- Joined: 09 Jun 2010 15:58
- Location: LT-RU-NY
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
«trained”? А такие бывают? Кто их trained? Они наверное не понимают о чем это. Бывают только «убежденные» марксисты. Но он не в курсе, что марксизм не о BLM совсем.Mini-DV wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 19:26Они сами себя так позиционируют:city_girl wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 19:10Только не понятно при чем тут “марксизм», типа ругательное слово?Mini-DV wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 18:55 Очень скоро все белые будут поддерживать БЛМ:
Schools prepare to train children in Marxist BLM curriculum
https://www.wnd.com/2020/07/4835849/
Black Lives Matter co-founder describes herself as ‘trained Marxist’
https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-fo ... d-marxist/
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 857
- Joined: 05 Aug 2004 21:24
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Вообще-то это сказал co-founder BLM, а не просто тётка с улицы. Вот к ней и все вопросы.city_girl wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 21:29«trained”? А такие бывают? Кто их trained? Они наверное не понимают о чем это. Бывают только «убежденные» марксисты. Но он не в курсе, что марксизм не о BLM совсем.Mini-DV wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 19:26Они сами себя так позиционируют:city_girl wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 19:10Только не понятно при чем тут “марксизм», типа ругательное слово?Mini-DV wrote: ↑16 Jul 2020 18:55 Очень скоро все белые будут поддерживать БЛМ:
Schools prepare to train children in Marxist BLM curriculum
https://www.wnd.com/2020/07/4835849/
Black Lives Matter co-founder describes herself as ‘trained Marxist’
https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-fo ... d-marxist/
Байдауны отс@сут!
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 12059
- Joined: 15 Feb 2002 10:01
- Location: TX
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Я думаю, что многие подростки, у которых не сформировалось мировоззрение на основе собственного жизненного опыта, легко поддаются на провокации и попадают под влияние ехтремистских течений призывающих улучшить жизнь всех людей за счет богатых. Они в том возрасте, когда еще не вкусили плод разочароваия, чтобы улучшить чью-то жизнь, надо отрезать половину заработка от его собственной семьи. Потому как, кто работает, тот и богатый. При чем работает начиная с начальной школы, делая уроки.
Вот что интересно, что никто не хочет вспомнить принцип социализьма, кто не работает, тот не ест. Даже принцип коммунизьма здесь какoй-то усеченный, вместо от каждого по способностям, каждому по потребностям, тока последнее вызывает интерес. Вот мне каецца, ето вот нерастворимый остаток и есть основа марксистского БЛМ
Вот что интересно, что никто не хочет вспомнить принцип социализьма, кто не работает, тот не ест. Даже принцип коммунизьма здесь какoй-то усеченный, вместо от каждого по способностям, каждому по потребностям, тока последнее вызывает интерес. Вот мне каецца, ето вот нерастворимый остаток и есть основа марксистского БЛМ
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 5665
- Joined: 15 Aug 2008 00:52
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Основной принцип социализма: владение государствов средствами производства.Likenew wrote: ↑17 Jul 2020 15:42 Я думаю, что многие подростки, у которых не сформировалось мировоззрение на основе собственного жизненного опыта, легко поддаются на провокации и попадают под влияние ехтремистских течений призывающих улучшить жизнь всех людей за счет богатых. Они в том возрасте, когда еще не вкусили плод разочароваия, чтобы улучшить чью-то жизнь, надо отрезать половину заработка от его собственной семьи. Потому как, кто работает, тот и богатый. При чем работает начиная с начальной школы, делая уроки.
Вот что интересно, что никто не хочет вспомнить принцип социализьма, кто не работает, тот не ест.
Основной принцип коммунизма: пробуждение и развитие в человеке высших творческих способностей. Принцип вроде и хороший, но вот методы...Даже принцип коммунизьма здесь какoй-то усеченный, вместо от каждого по способностям, каждому по потребностям, тока последнее вызывает интерес. Вот мне каецца, ето вот нерастворимый остаток и есть основа марксистского БЛМ
P.S. не знаю, ежели актуально, я там вам ответил по поводу докера на сентосе.
I would hope that a wise white man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a latina female who hasn't lived that life
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 12059
- Joined: 15 Feb 2002 10:01
- Location: TX
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Ну, ето большими словами, которые мало кто понимает. В осадке остается, кто-то должен платить за мои творческие развития.Alexander Troyansky wrote: ↑17 Jul 2020 15:52
Основной принцип социализма: владение государствов средствами производства.
Основной принцип коммунизма: пробуждение и развитие в человеке высших творческих способностей. Принцип вроде и хороший, но вот методы...Даже принцип коммунизьма здесь какой-то усеченный, вместо от каждого по способностям, каждому по потребностям, тока последнее вызывает интерес. Вот мне каецца, ето вот нерастворимый остаток и есть основа марксистского БЛМ
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 5665
- Joined: 15 Aug 2008 00:52
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
так и есть, если другими словамиLikenew wrote: ↑17 Jul 2020 17:08Ну, ето большими словами, которые мало кто понимает. В осадке остается, кто-то должен платить за мои творческие развития.Alexander Troyansky wrote: ↑17 Jul 2020 15:52
Основной принцип социализма: владение государствов средствами производства.
Основной принцип коммунизма: пробуждение и развитие в человеке высших творческих способностей. Принцип вроде и хороший, но вот методы...Даже принцип коммунизьма здесь какой-то усеченный, вместо от каждого по способностям, каждому по потребностям, тока последнее вызывает интерес. Вот мне каецца, ето вот нерастворимый остаток и есть основа марксистского БЛМ
I would hope that a wise white man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a latina female who hasn't lived that life
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 7869
- Joined: 05 Aug 2003 21:39
- Location: CA
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Miss Swimsuit UK, 23, is stripped of title over 'All Lives Matter' Facebook post.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... atter.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... atter.html
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 7869
- Joined: 05 Aug 2003 21:39
- Location: CA
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Jesus Christ Beheaded, Far left Suspected, And You Expect me To Believe Trump is LOSING?
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 11184
- Joined: 25 Mar 2004 02:31
- Location: 🌫⛆☔♕☔⛆🌫
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
BLMщики жгут флаги USA, загасились с параллельной демонстрацией в поддержку NYPD, такое чувство что полные обкурки
маска вниз и слюни в лицо полицейским
Полиция действует очень профессионально
Финал
Позвоните маме™
маска вниз и слюни в лицо полицейским
Полиция действует очень профессионально
Финал
Позвоните маме™
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Мир это Выхухоль.
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 9258
- Joined: 14 Dec 2001 10:01
- Location: Российская Федерация
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 7869
- Joined: 05 Aug 2003 21:39
- Location: CA
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Это уже конченные.
Этот шлак либо передознется, либо в разборках ножом пырнут.
Пуст разносят и жгут нахер свои портланды-сиэттлы-ньюйорки-миннеаполисы. И чтобы полиция массово там увольнялась. И ни копейки им из федеральных денег "на восстановление". Голосовали за либеральных пидоров - получайте по-полной.
Этот шлак либо передознется, либо в разборках ножом пырнут.
Пуст разносят и жгут нахер свои портланды-сиэттлы-ньюйорки-миннеаполисы. И чтобы полиция массово там увольнялась. И ни копейки им из федеральных денег "на восстановление". Голосовали за либеральных пидоров - получайте по-полной.
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 1951
- Joined: 11 Mar 2015 01:12
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Надо было кроме титула и купальник отобрать для закрепления материала.3DD wrote: ↑17 Jul 2020 18:48 Miss Swimsuit UK, 23, is stripped of title over 'All Lives Matter' Facebook post.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... atter.html
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 857
- Joined: 05 Aug 2004 21:24
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 5822
- Joined: 24 Feb 2012 19:09
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 769
- Joined: 31 Jul 2007 05:48
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 8473
- Joined: 31 Oct 2006 05:39
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
https://thuppahi.wordpress.com/2020/06/ ... xtremists/
Chris Patten (Lord Patten of Barnes), The Chancellor of Oxford University, to students who requested to remove statue of Rhodes:
“Oxford will not rewrite history”
Lord Patten commented: “Education is not indoctrination. Our history is not a blank page on which we can write our own version of what it should have been according to our contemporary views and prejudice.”
The letter (below) is a response from [one part of] Oxford University to black students attending as Rhodes Scholars who demand the university removes the statue of Oxford Benefactor, Cecil Rhodes.
“Dear Scrotty Students, …..
Cecil Rhodes’s generous bequest has contributed greatly to the comfort and well being of many generations of Oxford students – a good many of them, dare we say it, better, brighter and more deserving than you.
This does not necessarily mean we approve of everything Rhodes did in his lifetime – but then we don’t have to. Cecil Rhodes died over a century ago. Autres temps, autres moeurs. If you don’t understand what
this means – and it would not remotely surprise us if that were the case – then we really think you should ask yourself the question: “Why am I at Oxford?”
Oxford, let us remind you, is the world’s second oldest extant university. Scholars have been studying here since at least the 11th century. We’ve played a major part in the invention of Western civilisation, from the 12th century intellectual renaissance through the Enlightenment and beyond. Our alumni include William of Ockham, Roger Bacon, William Tyndale, John Donne, Sir Walter Raleigh, Erasmus, Sir Christopher Wren, William Penn, Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), Samuel Johnson, Robert Hooke, William Morris, Oscar Wilde, Emily Davison, Cardinal Newman, Julie Cocks. We’re a big deal. And most of the people
privileged to come and study here are conscious of what a big deal we are. Oxford is their alma mater – their dear mother – and they respect and revere her accordingly.
And what were your ancestors doing in that period? Living in mud huts, mainly. Sure we’ll concede you the short lived Southern African civilisation of Great Zimbabwe. But let’s be brutally honest here. The
contribution of the Bantu tribes to modern civilisation has been as near as damn it to zilch.
You’ll probably say that’s “racist”. But it’s what we here at Oxford prefer to call “true.” Perhaps the rules are different at other universities. In fact, we know things are different at other universities. We’ve watched with horror at what has been happening across the pond from the University of Missouri to the University of Virginia and even to revered institutions like Harvard and Yale: the “safe spaces”; the appalling black lives matter; the creeping cultural relativism; the stifling political correctness; what Allan Bloom rightly called “the closing of the American mind”. At Oxford however, we will always prefer facts and free, open debate to petty grievance-mongering, identity politics and empty sloganeering. The day we cease to do so is the day we lose the right to call ourselves the world’s greatest university.
Of course, you are perfectly within your rights to squander your time at Oxford on silly, vexatious, single-issue political campaigns. (Though it does make us wonder how stringent the vetting procedure is
these days for Rhodes scholarships and even more so, for Mandela Rhodes scholarships). We are well used to seeing undergraduates – or, in your case – postgraduates, making idiots of themselves. Just don’t expect us to indulge your idiocy, let alone genuflect before it. You may be black – “BME” as the grisly modern terminology has it – but we are colour blind. We have been educating gifted undergraduates from our former colonies, our Empire, our Commonwealth and beyond for many generations. We do not discriminate over sex, race, colour or creed.
We do, however, discriminate according to intellect.
That means, inter alia, that when our undergrads or postgrads come up with fatuous ideas, we don’t pat them on the back, give them a red rosette and say: “Ooh, you’re black and you come from South Africa.
What a clever chap you are!” No. We prefer to see the quality of those ideas tested in the crucible of public debate. That’s another key part of the Oxford intellectual tradition you see: you can argue any damn thing you like but you need to be able to justify it with facts and logic – otherwise your idea is worthless.
This ludicrous notion you have that a bronze statue of Cecil Rhodes should be removed from Oriel College, because it’s symbolic of “institutional racism” and “white slavery”. Well even if it is – which we dispute – so bloody what? Any undergraduate so feeble-minded that they can’t pass a bronze statue without having their “safe space” violated really does not deserve to be here. And besides, if we were to remove Rhodes’s statue on the premise that his life wasn’t blemish-free, where would we stop? As one of our alumni Dan Hannan has pointed out, Oriel’s other benefactors include two kings so awful – Edward II and Charles I – that their subjects had them killed. The college opposite – Christ Church – was built by a murderous, thieving bully who bumped off two of his wives. Thomas Jefferson kept slaves: does that invalidate the US Constitution? Winston Churchill had unenlightened views about Muslims and India: was he then the wrong man to lead Britain in the war?”
Actually, we’ll go further than that. Your Rhodes Must Fall campaign is not merely fatuous but ugly, vandalistic and dangerous. We agree with Oxford historian RW Johnson that what you are trying to do here is no different from what ISIS and the Al-Qaeda have been doing to artefacts in places like Mali and Syria. You are murdering history.
And who are you, anyway, to be lecturing Oxford University on how it should order its affairs? Your bloody rhodesmustfall campaign, we understand, originates in South Africa and was initiated by a black
activist who told one of his lecturers “whites have to be killed”. One of you – Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh – is the privileged son of a rich politician and a member of a party whose slogan is “Kill the Boer; Kill the Farmer”; another of you, Ntokozo Qwabe, who is only in Oxford as a beneficiary of a Rhodes scholarship, has boasted about the need for “socially conscious black students” to “dominate white universities, and do so ruthlessly and decisively ‘!
Great. That’s just what Oxford University needs. Some cultural enrichment from the land of Winnie Mandela, burning tyre necklaces, an AIDS epidemic almost entirely the result of government indifference
and ignorance, one of the world’s highest per capita murder rates, institutionalised corruption, tribal politics, anti-white racism and a collapsing economy. Please name which of the above items you think
will enhance the lives of the 22,000 students studying here at Oxford.
And then please explain what it is that makes your attention grabbing campaign to remove a listed statue from an Oxford college more urgent, more deserving than the desire of probably at least 20,000 of those
22,000 students to enjoy their time here unencumbered by the irritation of spoilt, ungrateful little tossers on scholarships they clearly don’t merit using racial politics and cheap guilt-tripping to ruin the life and fabric of our beloved university.
Understand us and understand this clearly: you have everything to learn from us; we have nothing to learn from you.
Yours, Oriel College, Oxford
Chris Patten (Lord Patten of Barnes), The Chancellor of Oxford University, to students who requested to remove statue of Rhodes:
“Oxford will not rewrite history”
Lord Patten commented: “Education is not indoctrination. Our history is not a blank page on which we can write our own version of what it should have been according to our contemporary views and prejudice.”
The letter (below) is a response from [one part of] Oxford University to black students attending as Rhodes Scholars who demand the university removes the statue of Oxford Benefactor, Cecil Rhodes.
“Dear Scrotty Students, …..
Cecil Rhodes’s generous bequest has contributed greatly to the comfort and well being of many generations of Oxford students – a good many of them, dare we say it, better, brighter and more deserving than you.
This does not necessarily mean we approve of everything Rhodes did in his lifetime – but then we don’t have to. Cecil Rhodes died over a century ago. Autres temps, autres moeurs. If you don’t understand what
this means – and it would not remotely surprise us if that were the case – then we really think you should ask yourself the question: “Why am I at Oxford?”
Oxford, let us remind you, is the world’s second oldest extant university. Scholars have been studying here since at least the 11th century. We’ve played a major part in the invention of Western civilisation, from the 12th century intellectual renaissance through the Enlightenment and beyond. Our alumni include William of Ockham, Roger Bacon, William Tyndale, John Donne, Sir Walter Raleigh, Erasmus, Sir Christopher Wren, William Penn, Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), Samuel Johnson, Robert Hooke, William Morris, Oscar Wilde, Emily Davison, Cardinal Newman, Julie Cocks. We’re a big deal. And most of the people
privileged to come and study here are conscious of what a big deal we are. Oxford is their alma mater – their dear mother – and they respect and revere her accordingly.
And what were your ancestors doing in that period? Living in mud huts, mainly. Sure we’ll concede you the short lived Southern African civilisation of Great Zimbabwe. But let’s be brutally honest here. The
contribution of the Bantu tribes to modern civilisation has been as near as damn it to zilch.
You’ll probably say that’s “racist”. But it’s what we here at Oxford prefer to call “true.” Perhaps the rules are different at other universities. In fact, we know things are different at other universities. We’ve watched with horror at what has been happening across the pond from the University of Missouri to the University of Virginia and even to revered institutions like Harvard and Yale: the “safe spaces”; the appalling black lives matter; the creeping cultural relativism; the stifling political correctness; what Allan Bloom rightly called “the closing of the American mind”. At Oxford however, we will always prefer facts and free, open debate to petty grievance-mongering, identity politics and empty sloganeering. The day we cease to do so is the day we lose the right to call ourselves the world’s greatest university.
Of course, you are perfectly within your rights to squander your time at Oxford on silly, vexatious, single-issue political campaigns. (Though it does make us wonder how stringent the vetting procedure is
these days for Rhodes scholarships and even more so, for Mandela Rhodes scholarships). We are well used to seeing undergraduates – or, in your case – postgraduates, making idiots of themselves. Just don’t expect us to indulge your idiocy, let alone genuflect before it. You may be black – “BME” as the grisly modern terminology has it – but we are colour blind. We have been educating gifted undergraduates from our former colonies, our Empire, our Commonwealth and beyond for many generations. We do not discriminate over sex, race, colour or creed.
We do, however, discriminate according to intellect.
That means, inter alia, that when our undergrads or postgrads come up with fatuous ideas, we don’t pat them on the back, give them a red rosette and say: “Ooh, you’re black and you come from South Africa.
What a clever chap you are!” No. We prefer to see the quality of those ideas tested in the crucible of public debate. That’s another key part of the Oxford intellectual tradition you see: you can argue any damn thing you like but you need to be able to justify it with facts and logic – otherwise your idea is worthless.
This ludicrous notion you have that a bronze statue of Cecil Rhodes should be removed from Oriel College, because it’s symbolic of “institutional racism” and “white slavery”. Well even if it is – which we dispute – so bloody what? Any undergraduate so feeble-minded that they can’t pass a bronze statue without having their “safe space” violated really does not deserve to be here. And besides, if we were to remove Rhodes’s statue on the premise that his life wasn’t blemish-free, where would we stop? As one of our alumni Dan Hannan has pointed out, Oriel’s other benefactors include two kings so awful – Edward II and Charles I – that their subjects had them killed. The college opposite – Christ Church – was built by a murderous, thieving bully who bumped off two of his wives. Thomas Jefferson kept slaves: does that invalidate the US Constitution? Winston Churchill had unenlightened views about Muslims and India: was he then the wrong man to lead Britain in the war?”
Actually, we’ll go further than that. Your Rhodes Must Fall campaign is not merely fatuous but ugly, vandalistic and dangerous. We agree with Oxford historian RW Johnson that what you are trying to do here is no different from what ISIS and the Al-Qaeda have been doing to artefacts in places like Mali and Syria. You are murdering history.
And who are you, anyway, to be lecturing Oxford University on how it should order its affairs? Your bloody rhodesmustfall campaign, we understand, originates in South Africa and was initiated by a black
activist who told one of his lecturers “whites have to be killed”. One of you – Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh – is the privileged son of a rich politician and a member of a party whose slogan is “Kill the Boer; Kill the Farmer”; another of you, Ntokozo Qwabe, who is only in Oxford as a beneficiary of a Rhodes scholarship, has boasted about the need for “socially conscious black students” to “dominate white universities, and do so ruthlessly and decisively ‘!
Great. That’s just what Oxford University needs. Some cultural enrichment from the land of Winnie Mandela, burning tyre necklaces, an AIDS epidemic almost entirely the result of government indifference
and ignorance, one of the world’s highest per capita murder rates, institutionalised corruption, tribal politics, anti-white racism and a collapsing economy. Please name which of the above items you think
will enhance the lives of the 22,000 students studying here at Oxford.
And then please explain what it is that makes your attention grabbing campaign to remove a listed statue from an Oxford college more urgent, more deserving than the desire of probably at least 20,000 of those
22,000 students to enjoy their time here unencumbered by the irritation of spoilt, ungrateful little tossers on scholarships they clearly don’t merit using racial politics and cheap guilt-tripping to ruin the life and fabric of our beloved university.
Understand us and understand this clearly: you have everything to learn from us; we have nothing to learn from you.
Yours, Oriel College, Oxford
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: 20 Feb 2014 19:32
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Маме позвоните . Вот чисто имхо, эти мамы со взрослыми оболтусами в бейсменте - часть проблемы . Идиотская « free to be you and me” ментальность взрастила огромное количество entitled бездельников . Как в Сиэтле , где каждый бариста и “artist”уверен в своём праве жить в даунтацне и считает, что это должно субсидироваться отобранными у полиции деньгами. Я вот как-то в припадке не билась , что не могла себе позволить жить пало альто в Калифорнии.
И времени шататься по ..хм демонстрациям , разнося заразу , а потом строчить по 100 постов в час в твиттер, у меня не было и нет. В отличие от.
И времени шататься по ..хм демонстрациям , разнося заразу , а потом строчить по 100 постов в час в твиттер, у меня не было и нет. В отличие от.
Last edited by Ladoshki on 19 Jul 2020 22:52, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 845
- Joined: 26 Feb 2019 23:13
- Location: CA
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Да, мне вот интересно узнать мнение родителей этих демонстрантов. Ведь многие ещё студенты и многим родители оплачивают учёбу. Родители одобряют действия детей или прекращают оплачивать учёбу?
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 7869
- Joined: 05 Aug 2003 21:39
- Location: CA
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
а родители такие же либерасты или торчки которым все пох, или сидят или "одели штаны и пошли дальше и хз где они сейчас"
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: 20 Feb 2014 19:32
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
..
Last edited by Ladoshki on 19 Jul 2020 22:51, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: 20 Feb 2014 19:32
Re: Почему так много белых поддерживает БЛМ?
Очепятку поправила