А многие ли из нас без гугла смогут сказать, кого убили почти миллион человек - туту или хутси? Или все же хуту или тутси...
И какие кто сделал выводы из трагедии? Я в который раз увидел подтверждение тезиса о том, что в политике нет справедливости, есть только свои интересы. Сильных интересует судьба слабых только если слабые на сегодня выгодны. И все мы в этом мире можем полагаться исключительно только на себя.
http://www.livejournal.com/users/mozgovaya/195646.html
Руанда, 10 лет геноцида
-
EMT
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 11040
- Joined: 15 May 2001 09:01
- Location: Minneapolis, MN (10000 lakes) USA
Re: Руанда, 10 лет геноцида
Gabo wrote:... И все мы в этом мире можем полагаться исключительно только на себя.
...
Так это - данное, само собой разумеющееся.
Мимоходом...
-
DmitryMA
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 783
- Joined: 20 May 2002 00:52
- Location: Israel-->Boston, USA
Re: Руанда, 10 лет геноцида
Gabo wrote:А многие ли из нас без гугла смогут сказать, кого убили почти миллион человек - туту или хутси?
Туту начали вырезать хутси. Хутси это не понравилось и они взялись за оружие. В результате - изгнали миллион туту из страны в Конго. Сейчас у власти находится племя хутси
-
DNA
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 292
- Joined: 26 Oct 2002 02:32
- Location: CANADA
Африка
[url=http://www.aboutsudan.com/issues/biological_holocaust/mortality_rates_rising_in_africa.htm]
In fact, on the African continent today, there are two notable trends: a rise in mortality across all ages, and a decrease in the fertility rate. Africa, although it may still be attaining an incremental rise in population at rates below 2% per annum, is heading towards a net decrease in population.
[/url]
[url=http://www.aboutsudan.com/issues/biological_holocaust/mortality_rates_rising_in_africa.htm]
In fact, on the African continent today, there are two notable trends: a rise in mortality across all ages, and a decrease in the fertility rate. Africa, although it may still be attaining an incremental rise in population at rates below 2% per annum, is heading towards a net decrease in population.
[/url]
"Главное в любом споре-вовремя перейти на личности!"-(с) М.Жванецкий
-
Броун
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: 29 Apr 2003 00:22
-
Ctrl-C
- Уже с Приветом
- Posts: 6333
- Joined: 14 May 2002 23:24
- Location: UA -> VA
Неплохая статейка
Отрывок:
The biggest, strongest tribes in Central Africa were the Hutu and the Tutsi, who were based in Rwanda and Burundi. They ended up in power over various parts of Congo at the end of the century just because nobody in Congo had the organization. The Hutu and the Tutsi are real law-abiding, organized people. If you've only heard about them from the genocide news out of Rwanda, that might seem surprising. But...well, to understand this you have to be willing to tell the bitter truth. And here it is: the people who do genocide best are law-abiding, decent, stand-up folks. Strange but true. Take the Germans: wouldn't hurt a fly...unless someone in uniform told them to. Then they would fry every fly on the planet.
The Tutsi and Hutu had been lucky - in a way. The European colonists liked hanging out in the Hutu and Tutsis' homelands, Rwanda and Burundi - cool mountain air, fertile volcanic soil. And they liked these two intelligent, obedient tribes. So they, um, "civilized" them. The Hutu and Tutsi turned into the most literate, Christian, tidy, hard-working people in Central Africa. Then the Europeans overseers left...and after a little while these two tribes get that old itch to wipe each other out. It was all organized. The churches helped out. Two of the big war criminals were nuns. It's like Invasion of the Body Snatchers, imagining hundreds of thousands of neat, clean Hutus with machetes running around cheerfully hacking every Tutsi or Tutsi-lover they catch. The old line, "I was just following orders," may seem pretty lame, but after you read about the Hutu killers you end up kind of believing it. They did it because they were told to.
Отрывок:
The biggest, strongest tribes in Central Africa were the Hutu and the Tutsi, who were based in Rwanda and Burundi. They ended up in power over various parts of Congo at the end of the century just because nobody in Congo had the organization. The Hutu and the Tutsi are real law-abiding, organized people. If you've only heard about them from the genocide news out of Rwanda, that might seem surprising. But...well, to understand this you have to be willing to tell the bitter truth. And here it is: the people who do genocide best are law-abiding, decent, stand-up folks. Strange but true. Take the Germans: wouldn't hurt a fly...unless someone in uniform told them to. Then they would fry every fly on the planet.
The Tutsi and Hutu had been lucky - in a way. The European colonists liked hanging out in the Hutu and Tutsis' homelands, Rwanda and Burundi - cool mountain air, fertile volcanic soil. And they liked these two intelligent, obedient tribes. So they, um, "civilized" them. The Hutu and Tutsi turned into the most literate, Christian, tidy, hard-working people in Central Africa. Then the Europeans overseers left...and after a little while these two tribes get that old itch to wipe each other out. It was all organized. The churches helped out. Two of the big war criminals were nuns. It's like Invasion of the Body Snatchers, imagining hundreds of thousands of neat, clean Hutus with machetes running around cheerfully hacking every Tutsi or Tutsi-lover they catch. The old line, "I was just following orders," may seem pretty lame, but after you read about the Hutu killers you end up kind of believing it. They did it because they were told to.
Ядерная война может испортить вам весь день.