Huge corruption in Pentagon

Мнения, новости, комментарии
User avatar
RobinF
Уже с Приветом
Posts: 3975
Joined: 04 Jun 2002 17:35

Huge corruption in Pentagon

Post by RobinF »

Почему никто не пишет???

http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2 ... tors_N.htm
Based on interviews and a review of public records, USA TODAY found:

• Of the 158 retired generals and admirals identified as having worked for the military as senior mentors, 80% had financial ties to defense contractors, including 29 who were full-time executives of defense companies. Those with industry ties have earned salaries, fees or stock options as consultants, board members or full-time employees of defense firms.

• Mentors are paid from about $200 to $340 an hour, plus expenses — many times the rate of pay for active-duty generals, who typically make $170,000 to $216,000 a year, including a housing allowance.

• Mentors are hired as independent contractors and are not subject to government ethics rules that would apply if they were hired as part-time federal employees. They don't have to disclose, either to the military or the public, the identities of their clients. Mentors are not barred from lobbying the same officers they are advising, from advertising their military adviser role on company websites, or from taking commercial advantage of insights gleaned through their government work.

• Mentors operate outside public scrutiny. Although the services have released broad pay rates, most won't say how much individual mentors have been paid, and one, the Missile Defense Agency, declined to release any names. Other services released some names but couldn't say the lists were complete. USA TODAY identified many mentors by scouring military documents and other public records.

• In some cases, mentors also work for weapons-makers who have an interest in the military planning the mentors are assisting. A Marines exercise last year, which explored how to launch operations from ships, employed mentors who also had financial relationships with companies that sell products designed to aid those operations.

"This setup invites abuse," says Janine Wedel, a George Mason University public policy professor and author of a forthcoming book on government contracting. "Everyone in this story is fat and happy. Everyone, of course, except the public, which has virtually no way of knowing what's going on, much less holding these guys to account."

If retired generals advising the Pentagon also are "being paid by somebody who wants to make money off the government, I think it's important the public know that," says Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who chairs the subcommittee on contracting oversight. "The reason ... is so the people have confidence that the decisions are being made based on merit, and not based on inside baseball."
Прочитайте всю статью. ВПК просто грабит страну. Впрочем, это было известно всякому кто сравнивал траты на DoD/DHS со сборами подоходных налогов.
User avatar
RobinF
Уже с Приветом
Posts: 3975
Joined: 04 Jun 2002 17:35

Re: Huge corruption in Pentagon

Post by RobinF »


In military news, seven retired admirals and generals have resigned from advisory roles with the Pentagon rather than comply with new rules on reporting outside income to avoid a conflict of interest. The former officers were among a group of 158 Pentagon officials identified in an investigation by the newspaper USA Today. Eighty percent of the so-called "mentors" were found to have ties to military contractors that they previously were not required to publicly disclose. A Boston Globe study early this month found that 80 percent of retiring three- and four-star officers went to work as consultants or defense executives from 2004 to 2008.
User avatar
RobinF
Уже с Приветом
Posts: 3975
Joined: 04 Jun 2002 17:35

Re: Huge corruption in Pentagon

Post by RobinF »


WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, the Bush years were a bonanza for the Lockheed Martin Corporation. They had a guy who went to run military space for the Air Force. They had the deputy national security adviser. They had the guy running the nuclear weapons complex. They had the guy who helped run the Homeland Security Department’s procurement program. All coming from Lockheed Martin.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Oh, that’s what I was going to say. When you say they "had" them, they all came from Lockheed Martin.

WILLIAM HARTUNG: They came from the company, so they were on the inside able to help them, yeah.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And when you say that they’re perhaps the most corrupt of the military-industrial companies, what do you mean?

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, starting with the cost overruns in the ’60s, they had record cost overruns on their C-5 aircraft. Then they were involved in the bribery scandals of the ’70s, where they bribed, you know, prime ministers in Japan and Italy. They bribed people in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. So basically they were at the cutting edge of many of these, you know, corruption scandals. They helped get government subsidies for their mergers in the ’90s, in a conflict-of-interest deal that involved William Perry.

JUAN GONZALEZ: Now, were they ever sanctioned for any of this?

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, the bribery scandals, a few of their executives had to step down. But no criminal charges were ever brought.

AMY GOODMAN: What was the C-5A scandal?

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, they were supposed an aircraft that could go anywhere, basically what they called a flying military base. And it was going to be, post-Vietnam, a way to intervene more quickly. But what happened was they ran a $2 billion cost overrun, and the thing didn’t work. The Air Force tried to cover it up. And Ernest Fitzgerald, the whistleblower, actually lost his job over exposing this. And only when William Proxmire went to his defense was he restored to his job in the Pentagon.

AMY GOODMAN: Now, why does the U.S. government pay for their scandal?

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, I mean, basically, there just wasn’t the backbone, you know, among the presidents of those eras to really say, "Look, you know, you’re the one who screwed up here; you should be paying the cost of it." But, you know, because of Proxmire, they did claw back a few hundred million of that $2 billion, but basically the company got off scot-free in many respects.

AMY GOODMAN: There’s a lot of discussion now about President Reagan. His son Ron Reagan is saying in his new book that he was suffering from Alzheimer’s through—well, through the majority of his administrations. But you have a whole chapter on—well, you call it "Reagan to the Rescue."

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, Reagan doubled Lockheed Martin’s contracts in the first three years he was in office. So they were a little bit behind the curve in the Carter years, when spending dropped. And so, this was the era of the $600 toilet seat, the $7,000 coffee maker, rigged Star Wars tests. All these were done by Lockheed Martin during the Reagan era. So, they got a huge boost in their contracts at the same time that they were bilking the government on all kinds of activities, as well as helping to rig the Star Wars program, which helped Reagan push it along at a time when people were saying, you know, "How is this thing ever going to work?"

JUAN GONZALEZ: And how—what kind of influence or largesse did they get from the Clinton administration, and now from the Obama administration?

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, Clinton years were good years for them, because that was the merger period. And they got a couple hundred million dollars to help them merge, to close down factories, even to pay executive bonuses for guys like Norm Augustine. We helped pay his golden parachute when he switched from Martin Marietta to Lockheed Martin. You know, so, basically—

AMY GOODMAN: How much?

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, he got $8 million, of which we paid $3 million directly and the rest indirectly, because that’s—we’re the only place they get money from, is the taxpayers.

JUAN GONZALEZ: And what about the Obama administration?

WILLIAM HARTUNG: Well, under Obama, you know, so far, so good. I mean, he hasn’t cut military spending. He did stop their F-22 combat aircraft, but he cut $4 billion from that and he added $4 billion to their F-35. So basically that was a wash, even though it was sort of portrayed as getting tough with Lockheed Martin.
User avatar
LeonidNYC
Уже с Приветом
Posts: 8496
Joined: 05 Oct 2006 18:59

Re: Huge corruption in Pentagon

Post by LeonidNYC »

RobinF wrote:Прочитайте всю статью. ВПК просто грабит страну. Впрочем, это было известно всякому кто сравнивал траты на DoD/DHS со сборами подоходных налогов.
Что бы мы делали без вас...
User avatar
RobinF
Уже с Приветом
Posts: 3975
Joined: 04 Jun 2002 17:35

Re: Huge corruption in Pentagon

Post by RobinF »

Похоже реальные проблемы индейцев шерифа не волнуют. Токма сидеть и онакирдыковедением заниматься, 11-й год подряд...
vaduz
Уже с Приветом
Posts: 27652
Joined: 15 Jul 2002 17:05
Location: MD

Re: Huge corruption in Pentagon

Post by vaduz »

Текста много.
Вот берите пример с PavelM, он в трех предложениях излагает суть.
User avatar
Lateralus
Уже с Приветом
Posts: 1188
Joined: 10 Jul 2010 03:46

Re: Huge corruption in Pentagon

Post by Lateralus »

RobinF wrote:Похоже реальные проблемы индейцев шерифа не волнуют. Токма сидеть и онакирдыковедением заниматься, 11-й год подряд...
Ну вы же вроде с 2002-го зарегестрировались, это еще не 11 лет.
Ыбемер
Уже с Приветом
Posts: 297
Joined: 28 Dec 2010 02:18
Location: Из мерзлоты

Re: Huge corruption in Pentagon

Post by Ыбемер »

Везде воруют...
Herrings
Уже с Приветом
Posts: 188
Joined: 26 Oct 2007 18:59
Location: околостоличная

Re: Huge corruption in Pentagon

Post by Herrings »

"...Mentors are hired as independent contractors and are not subject to government ethics rules that would apply if they were hired as part-time federal employees. They don't have to disclose, either to the military or the public, the identities of their clients. Mentors are not barred from lobbying the same officers they are advising, from advertising their military adviser role on company websites, or from taking commercial advantage of insights gleaned through their government work," - дык, за то им и платят даблл :lol: Пентагон - священная корова и никакие крики либералов их не напугают.

Return to “Политика”