http://www.theserverside.com/news/threa ... 1271#95043
In general though, the comparison between Struts and Turbine may not be "apples to apples". Struts is a nice implementation of MVC for the presentation tier, and clearly has gained critical mass in terms of mind share. Turbine, on the other hand, is more of an "end to end" Web app framework, which contains an MVC servlet, an O/R mapping layer (Torque), a services framework (Fulcrum), and a collection of pre-built services that you can use, without having to code them. IMO, a more apt comparison of Turbine might be to a framework like Expresso (which, I believe uses Struts for it's MVC servlet) or to another "end to end" framework.
It is possible to write your own services and/or plug in other code as a service in Turbine. For instance, you might be able to plug in Hibernate, or something else, to replace Torque. I don't think the MVC servlet can currently be replaced with Struts though, since the Turbine servlet is central to the whole framework. The existing MVC servlet really isn't that different from Struts IMO (e.g. Action classes, reflection based form processing, etc.) I would prefer that it were more mainstream though.
Получается стратс турбину переплевывает?
Thanks,
sabina