DimaDC wrote:slozovsk wrote:Т.е. если Вы считаете, что вас лично Буш не обманул, это не значит, что так считают все Американцы.
Да на здоровье, пускай себе считают. Я с ними и не спорю. Я так не считаю. Даже наоборот.
Кстати, Вы никак не прокомментировали мою ссылку - http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=34930
Я специально не квотировал, потому что там много текста. Но если лень туда смотреть - могу привести немного.
By telling Americans that Saddam could "on any given day" slip unconventional weapons to al-Qaida if America didn't disarm him, the president misrepresented the conclusions of his own secret intelligence report, which warned that Saddam wouldn't even try to reach out to al-Qaida unless he were attacked and had nothing to lose – and might even find that hard to do since he had no history of conducting joint terrorist operations with al-Qaida, and certainly none against the U.S.
If that's not lying, I don't know what is.
What's worse, the inconvenient conclusions about Iraq and al-Qaida were withheld from the unclassified version of the secret NIE report that Bush authorized for public release the day before his Cincinnati speech, as part of the launch of the White House's campaign to sell the war. The 25-page white paper, posted on the CIA website, focused on alleged weapons of mass destruction, and conveniently left out the entire part about Saddam's reluctance to reach out to al-Qaida. Americans also didn't see the finding that Saddam had no hand in 9-11 or any other al-Qaida attack against American territory. That, too, was sanitized.
Т.е. Вы считаете, что все правильно, так и надо? Автор считает это ложью, а вы?